NordicTrack

A three-part user testing sequence evaluating a brand new “big swing” PDP design.

USABILITYGENERATIVE RESEARCHEVALUATIVE RESEARCH
Role
Lead Researcher
Industry
Fitness
Year
2023
Agency
Roboboogie

Impact

People

Understood user behaviors, motivations, and friction points through research

Product

Identified opportunities to improve the product detail page experience and increase confidence in purchase decisions

Purpose

Connected customer insights with conversion goals to guide optimization decisions

Process

A mixed-method research program evaluating a high-value ecommerce product page.

Phase 01

Context & Background

  • Test 1: Checkout Flow Moderated User Test
  • Test 2: Existing PDP Baseline Unmoderated User Test
  • Competitive Audit: High-Value Product Pages
Phase 02

Design & Validation

  • High-fidelity, bluesky PDP prototype design created by Lead Designer, incorporating findings from Phase 1
  • Test 3: PDP Prototype Unmoderated User Test
Phase 03

Iterate & Impact

  • Report 1: low-lift immediate improvement recommendations for existing PDP
  • Report 2: prototype iterations made for higher lift implementation and development of new PDP design
Existing PDP; subject of Tests 1 & 2
Existing PDP; subject of Tests 1 & 2
CONTEXT & BACKGROUND

Evaluating the Existing Experience

Test 1: Checkout Flow Moderated User Test Test 2: Existing PDP Baseline Unmoderated User Test The first two tests evaluated the existing checkout flow and product page in an effort to reach a baseline understanding of performance with users. Test 2 specifically focused on user comprehension of the hardware/software relationship between NordicTrack products and their subscription workout content platform, iFIT.

Prototype by Design Lead based on feedback from first two tests
Prototype by Design Lead based on feedback from first two tests
FUTURE-STATE EXPLORATION

Creating a New Premium Experience

Competitive Audit: Looking at other high-value product pages After synthesizing data from our first two tests and strategic recommendations from the competitive audit, our Lead Designer created a prototype of a new product page that aimed to have better user comprehension of the hardware/software relationship.

Prototype by Design Lead based on feedback from first two tests
Prototype by Design Lead based on feedback from first two tests
PROTOTYPE EVALUATION

Testing the Prototype Against the Current Experience

Test 3: Premium PDP Prototype Unmoderated User Test Our third and final user test evaluated the premium PDP prototype using the same questions and format as Test 2 in order to have a direct comparison. User comprehension of the hardware/software relationship was higher than it was on the existing PDP, and several participants had “Wow!” moments about the quality of the content.

Current, live PDP that reflects one of our low-lift recommendations
Current, live PDP that reflects one of our low-lift recommendations
OUTCOME

Low-lift Improvements Implemented

The client adopted several of our low-lift improvements recommended in our final report. One recommendation was to add helpful contextual info to related products in the shopbox, allowing for an easier comparison experience. This change is reflected in the current live version of their PDP.